Get The Facts - The Truth About Trapping
In this section you will learn and have access to information that will help you to counter the arguments given in support of the use of body-gripping traps. You will find what is useful to know, and how to apply the information in seeking to ban cruel traps.
No two campaigns to ban cruel traps will be identical in every way, but here you will find the kind of information that should assist you in addressing the specific issues of your own campaign.
Why & Where Animals Are Trapped
Virtually all wildlife trapping falls under one of two broad categories:
- Killing Animals for Fur: Traplines and fur farms are the sources of fur and fur trim used for various forms of clothing and accessories. Born Free USA united with API is part of the Fur Free Alliance, which addresses the fur trade issues. By reducing the use of furs, we can reduce the number of animals suffering from the cruelty of trapping. While there may be some animals trapped for fur in urban and suburban settings, it is particularly associated with rangelands, forests and wilderness or semi-wilderness areas.
- Wildlife Damage Control: This includes everything from dealing with problems caused by animals to owners of residences or small businesses (such as skunks under the back porch or woodchucks in the vegetable garden) to massive slaughter of wildlife in the name of predator control (such as the killing of coyotes on public rangeland at the behest of sheep farmers) or to eradicate populations of wildlife deemed as "vermin" or "pests" (such as ground squirrels or prairie-dogs). Such trapping can occur anywhere the law allows, but is mostly associated with urban and suburban regions, farmland and open rangeland.
Sometimes these two broad categories overlap. Animals killed in order to remove predators or "nuisance" wildlife may also have their skins marketed for fur.
The following charts give some idea of the scope of the problem, numbers of animals used, and the methods used.
- Chart: Number of Predators Killed & Methods Used by USDA's Wildlife Services in Fiscal Year 2004
- Chart: Number of Predators Killed & Methods Used by USDA's Wildlife Services in Fiscal Year 2003
- Chart: Number of Coyotes Killed & Methods Used by USDA's Wildlife Services in Fiscal Year 2004
- Chart: Number of Animals Killed By USDA'S Wildlife Services' Aerial Gunning Program - 2001-2004
- Chart: Wildlife Killed & Methods Used by USDA's Wildlife Services in Fiscal Year 2003, California.
Other information that may help you to understand this issue include:
- Article: Seeking Justice from Animal Issues, Volume 37 Number 2, Summer 2006
- Article: Standardizing Cruelty: The International Trapping Debate from Animal Issues, Volume 37 Number 1, Spring 2006
- Article: Biting Back: New Tools for Targeting Cruel Traps from Animal Issues, Volume 36 Number 3, Fall 2005
- Article: Cooperative Problem Solving: the Marin County Livestock Protection Program (Acrobat PDF), from Grown in Marin Volume 4, Number 5, November 2005
- Article: Wildlife Control Out of Control from Animal Issues, Volume 35 Number 2, Summer 2004
- Article: Critters in the 'Hood from Sacramento News & Review, December 12, 2002
- Article: Predators, Politics, and Prejudice from Animal Issues, Volume 34 Number 3, Fall 2003
Trapping on National Wildlife Refuges
Born Free USA united with API has worked hard on the problem of trapping on National Wildlife Refuges, originally set aside to provide sanctuary for wildlife, but are now places where large numbers of wild animals are killed.
Other information that may help you to understand this issue include:
- Article: Fewer Trappers, More Wildlife-Watchers from Animal Issues, Volume 30 Number 1, Spring 1999
- Article: Ban Trapping on National Wildlife Refuges from Animal Issues, Volume 31 Number 2, Summer 2000
- Article: Trapped in the Refuge from Animal News, Winter 1996
- Article: Sanctuaries Corrupted into Killing Fields from Animal Issues, Volume 29 Number 2, Summer 1998
- Poll: Americans Strongly Oppose Trapping on National Wildlife Refuges
- Article: Opposing Arguments-Trapping on National Wildlife Refuges (Acrobat PDF), from Wild Earth Forum, Volume 13 Number 4, Winter 2003-2004
- Fact Sheet: Trapping on National Wildlife Refuges
- API's comprehensive report on Trapping in the National Wildlife Refuge System is reprinted as Chapter Six (pp. 113-119) and Appendix V (pp. 191-210) in Cull of the Wild: A Contemporary Analysis of Wildlife Trapping in the United States. Copies of Cull of the Wild are free with a shipping and handling charge of only $4.95 each here or downloaded as an Acrobat PDF file for free here.
Impact on Non-Target Animals & Humans
Fur trappers will tell you that it is in their interest to catch only the species they are after, and that they have the skills to set traps that will only catch those species. The sad reality is that most traps are notoriously indiscriminate. Nooses designed to catch squirrels running along limbs may ensnare woodpeckers taking the same route, or a curious jay. Leghold traps or footsnares set for foxes may snap on the foot of a deer or a dog or anything else that steps on the trap. Baits meant for wolves are known to attract eagles, rare species such as wolverines, or other non-target animals. A companion dog out walking with her owner or a cat looking for mice near a stream may suddenly be crushed by a Conibear trap set for muskrats. Even people, particularly curious children, can be caught or hurt by these traps.
As tragic as all this is, it is important to remember that you can use such sad incidences to help convince the appropriate legislating authority to ban the use of these traps.
Born Free USA united with API is actively involved in documenting abuse of animals for traps. Please take a moment to examine our Trapping Incident Report Form. By filling it out and submitting it to Born Free USA united with API it helps us to produce the data-base so necessary to convince authorities, the media and the general public that quite apart from what they do to the animals they are meant to catch, body-gripping traps are a menace to companion animals, non-target wildlife and even humans, and should be banned.
You may also wish to examine: